Sunday, June 9, 2013
organelle, pebble, straw, plow
If, in the course of evolution, species A incorporated members of B as organelles, how is the problem thus solved different from the members of Aves species C ingesting selected pebbles or members of Corvus selecting and bending a straw, stalk or stick ?
Heidegger's chief error may have been his faux insight into tekne (technique, Technik.) Husserl's second bit of folly was to follow Heidegger on the telescope.
Compare : a philosophical anthropology of play, dance and concept.
[ the chorus heard in response : "Heidegger was not doing philosophical anthropology !" ]
What offended Heidegger were the diesel tractors in the fields. He took the trains to see and talk with Jaspers on Jaspers' wife's small inheritance (from a business venture?) and would one day take an aeroplane.
[ the chorus : Heidegger and Husserl were on a hike together ... ]
When the hike began, Husserl was going on a hike with Heidegger, but when they returned, Heidegger had taken Husserl somewhere the old professor need not have gone - or gone along with ( mit-fahren ) ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Does the fetlock of the horse solve a problem ? If so, what is its place in the co-constitution of the horse experience of gait ( What is it like to be a horse with this gait so unlike that gait ?)
Was Heideggger one of the 13% with the tarsals betraying their role in grasping in the hominid evolutionary path ? And Husserl one of the 87% ?
Post a Comment